Let's delve into the geopolitical strategies of major players in the hypothetical World War 3 scenario as described in the provided data. We'll focus on the strategies of key actors, such as the United States, Russia, China, and others. Here's an analysis of their strategies:

United States:

• The scenario outlines that the U.S. abandons Ukraine and withdraws from NATO, which has significant implications.
• This withdrawal signals a shift in U.S. geopolitical strategy, potentially focusing on other global priorities or adopting a more isolationist stance.
• The U.S. appears hesitant to intervene in European conflicts, which may lead to delayed responses and consequences.

Russia:

• Russia seizes the opportunity presented by the U.S. withdrawal to expand its influence in Eastern Europe.
• The successful attack on Baltic states suggests a calculated geopolitical move.
• The use of nuclear weapons as a response indicates a willingness to escalate conflicts rapidly.

China:

• China's attempt to annex Taiwan reflects its longstanding territorial ambitions.
• The use of nuclear weapons against U.S. carriers demonstrates a willingness to challenge the U.S. militarily.
• China's actions in this scenario suggest a focus on regional dominance and challenging U.S. influence in Asia.

Middle East Players (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel):

• Saudi Arabia and Iran's race to acquire nuclear weapons highlights the importance of nuclear deterrence in the region.
• Israel becomes involved in conflicts, potentially to secure its own interests and prevent nuclear proliferation.
• These actions indicate a complex web of alliances and rivalries in the Middle East.

India and Pakistan:

• India's support for Israel and subsequent war with Pakistan could be driven by geopolitical considerations and regional power dynamics.
• The collapse of Pakistan and the use of nuclear weapons by non-state actors present significant challenges for South Asia.